点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
北方雨雪稀少气温回升 南方阴雨持续升温乏力******
中国天气网讯 未来三天(2月4日至6日)，我国延续北晴南雨的天气格局，中东部气温以回升为主，西北地区东部、华北中南部、黄淮地区最高气温将升至10℃以上，但南方多地受频繁阴雨影响，气温回升乏力。
南方正经历今年以来最长连阴雨过程 局地雨量较常年同期偏多1倍以上
昨天，南方降雨发展增多，福建西北部、江西中部、湖南中部、云南南部等地部分地区出现中到大雨，局地暴雨。
未来三天，北方大部雨雪稀少，南方仍维持多阴雨的天气格局，广东、广西、湖南、江西等部分地区雨势较强。中央气象台预计，今天，内蒙古东北部、黑龙江中西部、新疆北部和沿天山地区、西藏北部和东南部、川西高原等地的部分地区有小到中雪或雨夹雪；江南南部、华南中北部等地的部分地区有中到大雨，局地有暴雨。
明天，黑龙江东北部、吉林东部、新疆北部和南疆盆地西部山区、西藏东南部、青海南部、川西高原等地的部分地区有小雪或雨夹雪；黄淮南部、江淮大部、江汉大部、西南地区东部、江南、华南、台湾岛等地的部分地区有小到中雨，其中，江西中南部、福建东南部和西北部、广西东部、广东西北部等地的部分地区有大雨。
后天，内蒙古中部、吉林东部、新疆北部和南疆盆地西部山区、西藏南部和东部、青海南部、川西高原等地的部分地区有小到中雪或雨夹雪；西藏东南部、西南地区东部、江淮、江汉大部、江南、华南大部、台湾岛等地的部分地区有小到中雨，其中，湖南南部、广西东北部等地的部分地区有大雨。
目前，南方地区正在经历今年以来时间最长的一轮连阴雨天气过程，未来十天，江汉、江淮、江南、华南及贵州、西藏东南部等大部地区累计降水量较常年同期偏多4～7成，局地甚至偏多1倍以上；贵州、广西、湖南、江西中部、浙江西南部、福建北部等地雨水几乎“天天见”，当地公众需关注连阴雨天气对交通出行、生产生活的不利影响。
回暖！华北黄淮等地最高气温将超10℃ 南方多地昼夜温差缩小
受冷空气南下影响，昨天，南方大部气温继续下降，江南不少地方最高气温降至个位数，湿冷感明显，而长江以北地区已经开启升温步伐。
今天开始，中东部气温以回升为主，预计本周末至下周初，最高气温10℃线将北抬至河北中部至北京一带，西北地区东部、华北中南部、黄淮地区最高气温将超过10℃。不过6日后还将有冷空气活动，届时北方各地气温会再有波动。
在南方，各地气温今起虽陆续回升，但在雨水的“打压”下，气温回升乏力，昼夜温差明显缩小，像是长沙，今天最高气温5℃、最低气温3℃，全天气温低迷，湿冷持续，当地居民需注意保暖。(中国天气网)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)